Gustav Klimt

The artwork of Gustav Klimt is reminiscent of Freudian philosophy and the political atmosphere of the early 20th century in Austria. Unlike Freud, who distanced himself from politics and sought refuge in his theories, Klimt brought himself closer to politics through his artwork and was president of the Secessionist movement. Secessionists believed in a “break with the fathers” reinforcing the political context of Freud’s Oedipus complex. The movement itself was for Klimt what political authority was for Freud, fuel for the fire of creativity.

Before 1897, when the Secession had established itself with Gustav Klimt as president, Klimt's artwork was merely a decorative display of artistic talent. The artwork commissioned from him for the new Burgtheater is unlike any of the many works associated with his name.


"Shakespeare's Theatre", 1886-8


"Auditorium of the Old Burgtheatre", 1888.

Activity: Click here Google Image Search and type Klimt in the search box. Next click search and see what you find. It is highly unlikely that the search will return the two images above because they are not typical images of the Secession movement or Klimt himself.
The drastic contrast between these earlier decorative paintings and those typical of Klimt reflect Klimt's personal choice to portray the following ideas central to the succession movement:
"Cultural renewal, personal introspection, modern identity, asylum from modernity, truth and pleasure, the common rejection of the nineteenth century's certainties." (Schorske, pg. 219)

Klimt's series of portraits of aristocratic Viennese women are a more typical example of the artwork for which he is known and which reflect the values detailed above. Each one is exemplary of the innovative artistic style which the Secession valued so highly. Their motto, "to the age its art, to art its freedom" is an idea in accordance with the definition of the modern.


"Adele Bloch-Bauer I", 1907.


"Fritza Riedler", 1906.

These paintings are unique because they combine elements of the real and surreal, breaking free from the constraints of a genre. The faces of the women are quite realistic while their clothing is stylized and seems indistinguishable from the background. The two seem to come from entirely different periods of art. Klimt's brilliance comes in his decision to combine the two and go against the standards taught to him in the School of Arts and Crafts.

Klimt's "Judith and Holfernes" reinforces the ideas behind the Oedipus Complex through the medium of painting. The piece is full of warm colors which detract from the violence of the scene and display Judith, "fresh from her love slaying of Holofernes glowing in her quasi-maternal voluptuousness." (Schorske, pg. 224) As the story goes, Judith slew King Holofernes to free her people from his strict rule. Although here she is not the Oedipal son, she is the slayer of the authority, a theme central to the political context of the Oedipus complex. Klimt proves this idea does not belong to Freud alone but the community of modern thinkers who have begun to desire the influence of the authority. They are fighting to become Oedipus, forgetful that they will soon gouge out their own eyes.