Romanticism: A Definition

       Whereas Neoclassicism was the revival of classical architecture, Romanticism could include the revival of any style; it was for the artist to decide. This individualist expression is what best describes Romanticism: the lack of adherence to convention, the lack of identification with a group, and the notion of difference from past movements.

            Though the Romantics revived old styles of art, they still sought to cut ties with Òall fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions.Ó[1]  They put their own spin on old styles, whether by combining them with new fashions or by using them in new contexts. In addition, Òthe Romantic generation was indeed very conscious of breaking sharply with its parents and grandparentsÓ[2] in that it wanted to have itÕs own new voice. The modernism lies in the curiousity about and experimentation with old styles and old Òtruths,Ó and the eagerness to push boundaries.

            In the same way that Enlightenment philosophers believed in disassociation with exclusive religious sects, Romantics, such as ThŽodore GŽricault, did not want to be identified as an artistic sect. They preferred to be seen as the artistic versions of intellectuals; men not confined by a specific manner in which they had to express themselves. To link themselves exclusively to one order was the very thing against which they were protesting. They instead chose to use whatever style provoked an interest or emotion in them. Therefore, in theory, an architect could choose to sample from classical architecture if it so moved him. In such a way is it possible to combine Romanticism and Neoclassicism. Both involved revivals of old orders.

           

Brighton Pavillion

A prime example of a Romantic building in London is John NashÕs Royal Pavillion in Brighton. The styles Nash chose to revive were wide-ranging: from Gothic to Chinese to Arabic to Indian. This was typical of Romanticism; the artists did not want to adhere to one, constricting style. Nash chose styles which interested him; though they seem thrown together sloppily, that was the Romantic way. The Royal Pavillion resembles the Taj Mahal in India, with many puffy domes as elements of Indian revival. It has many minarets, the Arab towers that are used to call people to prayer. The interesting geometric motifs throughout the facade brings in the Arabic element. Gothic pillars and arches and Chinese screens are also apparent. These combinations were so distinctive that they provoked a new term: Indian Gothic. The uniqueness, variety, and individuality of NashÕs design are the essence of Romanticism.

           

           Back to Home Page



[1] Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto.

[2] Encyclopedia of Philosophy p. 207