The Pre-Commune Chaos
The
act of the French Government following the end of the combat between
Louis-Napoleons troops and the Prussian army contributed greatly to the birth
of the commune inside of Paris following the end of combat. When the orders
were given to lay down arms and surrender, the Parisians were furious, feeling
that they could and should continue their resistance. Eventually, this anger
against the government played a huge role in convincing the Parisians to rise
up against it.
Paris
was surrounded by the Prussians, who had been laying siege to the city for some
three months. Food supplies had dwindled, and even the bourgeois resorted to
eating horses, then dogs and cats, and finally, mice. The last French army in
the field, commanded by a General Bazaine, surrendered to the Prussians at
Metz. Once Bazaine was out of the field, Otto von Bismarck, added to the
horrors of Paris by systematically bombarding the city.
The Return of Adolphe Thiers and the Decision to
Surrender
In
the meantime, Adolphe Thiers, who was a long standing member of the
French government and the de-facto Ambassador to Prussia during this state of
affairs, returned to Paris from Berlin. He immediately began advocating an
acceptance of Prussias surrender terms to General Trochu. Thiers had a
reputation for being conservative and unsympathetic towards the working class,
making them instantly suspicious of his goals. This, in conjunction with
Thiers return created the potential for an explosion inside Paris. Many
Parisians feared that Thiers return heralded the return of an Imperial
monarchy, something the French had quite enough of in the previous hundred
years.
The
mayor of Montmartre, Georges Clemenceau, ended the waiting when he
declared, The municipality of the 18th Arrondissement protests with
indignation against an armistice which the Government could not accept without
committing treason.[1]
Clemenceaus declaration caused outrage in Paris. The National Guard,
furious over the entire affair, stopped shooting at the Prussians and started
marching through the city. The seat of government in the Htel de Ville was
surrounded by an angry mob, typical of the mobs of the French Revolutions on
1789 and 1848. The Reds, wearing the uniform of the National Guard, seized
Trochu and his government. Behind them strode some of the great figures of the Commune,
Blanqui, Flourens, Delescluze, Pyat, and Millire,
who demanded that Trochu resign. The radical leaders sat around a table,
holding swords and pistols to the heads of the remaining government, and talked
all day about their new government. Long before they were finished, the people
of Paris were declaring that, The Government has been overthrown and the
Commune established... [2]
Stalling the Revolution
However,
to pronounce that to be the case was somewhat premature. The total confusion
inside the Htel de Ville allowed a group of loyal guardsmen to smuggle
President Trochu out of the building and to the Louvre. Trochu, unwilling to
escalate the conflict, hoped to end the revolution without further bloodshed.
Taking advantage of the confusion over the National Guard uniform and the
loyalties of the guard, Trochu managed to surround the Htel de Ville with
loyal guardsmen, get inside, and capture most of the revolutionary leaders.
Flourens is said to have remarked that it was Trochus only successful
military operation during the whole siege.[3]
Indeed,
with revolution seemingly averted, General Trochu prepared for a final battle,
the Great Sortie against the Prussians. General DAureille had defeated a
Prussian army outside of Paris with forces that had been assembled by Lon
Gambetta in Tours. Gambetta was the wild card in the affair. He had
political clout and control over most of France, and his organization would be
key to the military operation. As had been the problem with French warfare
during Napoleon IIIs command
however, organization was the one big problem. The French use of hot air
balloons to get messages to their allies abroad was reasonably effective, but
it did not allow for a return message to Paris. When the Ville dOrlans, the balloon carrying the orders
and arrangements for the battle from Paris to Gambetta ended up in Norway by
mistake, the confusion that resulted was total. The French military action was
uncoordinated and spastic, and the French were unable to bring any
concentration of force to bear. Perhaps more importantly, the weather had done
drastic damage to the French fortifications, but General Trochu refused to give
up the operation in fear of a revolt. When the combat began, it looked even for
about a day. The French, divided and without reinforcements, could not stand
against the larger Prussian army.
Once the battle was over, news arrived in Paris that General DAureille,
still moving forward to join the Parisian army, had been engaged by another Prussian
army and would be unable to assist.
More Revolts
There
would be no more serious hope to save Paris from the Prussian siege. Inside
Paris, malcontent citizens fed their anger with drink, as red wine was one of
the few items stockpiled in the city that never ran out. On the 22 of January,
seventeen days after the failure of the Great Sortie reached Paris, a group of
radicals assaulted the prison where Flourens and his fellow radical leaders,
arrested the previous year, were being held. In the confusion many of them
escaped, including Flourens. The angry mob was far from finished, however.
Following their victory at the prison, they marched on the Htel de Ville where
they began demonstrating outside. Both the soldiers inside the building and the
radical members of the National Guard, who had joined the protest, were armed.
Who fired the first shot is unclear, but once there had been one shot, many
more followed. Inside a besieged city, a second, smaller siege began. At first,
neither side was shooting to kill, but following death of one of the leaders of
the protest the conflict became brutal. A second leader, Louise
Michel, was given the title la rouge vierge, or the red virgin, for her
part in causing the escalation of the conflict. She wore a uniform, carried a
rifle, and shot to kill, as well as yelling at her own people if they did not
do the same.
Jules
Favre, who had been one of the key figures in the founding of the Second
Republic, was given the task of drafting an armistice with Prussia. Once combat
had began between two factions of his own people, he saw the desperate need for
peace. Just five days after the violent war over the Htel de Ville, he agreed
to sign the armistice agreement with Prussia. The peace caused a temporary lull
between all the factions as supplies were brought in from abroad. In the
meantime, Thiers succeeded Trochu as president of the French republic. His lack
of sympathy for the working class earned him an even greater distrust now that
he was the ruler of Paris. General DAureille, who was not a Parisian, took
command of the Paris National Guard. DAureille was also awarded with great
animosity because he had not been able to save Paris during the Great Sortie,
and the fact that he neither liked nor respected the city he was now appointed
to defend did nothing to improve his standing.
Bismarcks Humiliation of Paris
The
final act of Prussia before Bismarck departed the city was a grand, celebratory
march around the Arc de Triomphe. To the Parisians, it was the greatest of
humiliations. The Prussians marched through the city for two days. Seven
Prussian officers had the audacity to jump their horses over the barriers
placed by the French around the sacred Arc de Triomphe, and actually proceed
through it. Bismarck himself marched through the city shortly before the
Prussian departure, making sure that the French knew that they had been
defeated. Immediately after his departure the French began to scrub the streets
clean and burned the roads that the Prussians had walked upon in an attempt to purge them of the disgrace.
| Go to Opening Page |
| Background information on the Franco-Prussian War |
| The Founding of the Paris Commune |
[1] Alistair Horne, The Terrible Year . Page 41.
[2] Ibid, Page 43.
[3] Ibid, Page 45