| | | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | ||||||
| | | | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||||
| | | | | |||||||||
| Severin Klosowski (1865-1903):
When Chapman was convicted, Inspector Abberline apparently rejoiced in the capture of the man he believed may have been Jack the Ripper. While Chapman was certainly capable of murder, misogynistic, and lived near Whitechapel during the murders, there is some discrepancy. For one thing, Chapman was only 23 during the Whitechapel murders, much younger than the witnesses describe. Also, he had just recently emigrated from Poland, and the Ripper was described as eloquent; it is unlikely that an immigrant could achieve such fluency in English in a little over a year. More important to some historians is the difference in the modus operandi of the Rippers murders and Chapmans poisoning. The former were fast, bloody, and brutal mutilations; the latter were slow, calculated, cunning exterminations (the poison Chapman used, antimony, must be administered in low doses over a large period of time to avoid being regurgitated all this comes from Chapmans extensive medical knowledge). Some historians argue that the modus operandi of a serial killer would not change so drastically; others believe that different classes of women required different kinds of murder. Additionally, Chapman had grown older, and might have "learned more" about killing and decided that poisoning would be best. In the end there is no way to determine whether or not it is logical that Chapman change his means of murder so drastically.
| | ||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2000. Kirsch Computing/ECFS. All Rights Reserved. Questions, Comments Problems? Don't Hesitate to contact us: webmaster@kirschnet.com | | |||||||||||