| |
|
During
the time of political struggle and conflict in Britain during the
18th and 19th centuries, the two main political organizations that
sparked a whole new era of reformation, conservatism, parliamentary
determination and rivalry were the Whigs and the Tories. Although
the adversary political organizations were successful in many ways,
they were also unsuccessful in others. While the Tories opposed parliamentary
reform, the Whigs had already established the supremacy of Parliamentary
over the King. The Whigs were more successful than the Tories due
to the management and organization, as well as creation of their policies
and adherence to their reform bills, and, not to be left out, their
proposal to resolve the political anachronisms of England throughout
the 18th and 19th centuries. The Tories were indeed organized as seen
through their preservation of traditional political structure and
later on Conservative Party elements and reforms, but they could not
handle all at once or over time the unification of their political
structure. Their impulsive decision making and their failure to reach
out to the needs of the people also contributed to the downfalls of
their party. The introduction of the Whigs and Whig Party throughout
the 17th and 18th centuries introduced sentiments of governmental
control, popularity within particular boroughs, and ascension of their
party platform. The name came into use in the 1680s in England when
there was the threat of establishment of a line of Catholic Kings,
starting with James II. The Protestant element, that stated that Parliament
could prevent such a succession, came to be called Whigs (named after
a radical Presbyterian group in Scotland, called Whigamores). The
party was largely responsible for the Glorious Revolution of 1688,
which established the supremacy of Parliament over the King. Backed
by businessmen, industrialists, untitled landowning gentry and religious
nonconformists, the Whig Party achieved control of the government
in 1714 on the accession of King George I. In 1760, they lost power
and became identified with those American colonists who supported
American Independence. For nearly fifty years the Whigs remained in
power until the Tory Party arose during this time, and introduced
conservative sentiments into office. Leaving the idea of the Whig
prevention of a line of Catholic Kings, the party adhering to the
doctrine of the rights of King James II (and naturally containing
Catholic as well as royalist elements), were called Tories. They were
named after bands of Irish Catholics who had been driven to become
outlaws due to the crusade of the English against the church they
clung to. The term was also applied to the monarchists in the House
of Commons. By the 18th century the Tories were politicians who favored
royal authority, the established church and who sought to preserve
the traditional political structure and opposed parliamentary reform.
Over time, the Party became more aggressive, and opened up a new era
with a serious of reforms. |
| |
|
Economic
History
London has been
for a long time a commercial city. The sight chosen by the Romans
as their harbor and military camp leant itself well to trade, and,
as a town in the medieval period, London was a center of English
manufacture and commerce. As time progressed, London's power and
import grew to such an extent that a description of its economy
would be inseparable from one of England's as a whole. As Europe
entered the seventeenth century, the time- honored system of guilds,
masters, and apprentices began to give way, on the account of increased
population and the emergence of trade as a main focus of the economy,
to a system of masters and workmen. In Stuart England, the term,
"journeyman", still had meaning, but, financially, it was hardly
its own class, with some members as owners of large companies and
others as their laborers. With a large work force of former peasants
made obsolete by new agricultural technology, England had an almost
insupportable group of vagrants, and London had enough poor to keep
down wages. This allowed industrialists to invest in equipment and
joint- venture stock companies, the most renowned of which, the
East India Company, formed in 1600. Pure capitalism, however, did
not yet exist in England until near the end of the seventeenth century,
when the crown ceased to illegally auction monopolies in certain
trades. Customs on foreign products remained high, encouraging British
manufacture. Export duties on wheat and barley,created to decrease
fears of shortage and to help landowners, were not removed until
the nineteenth century. Unlike northern continental nations, England
declassified quite quickly and quite easily. In the 1600's, merchants
owned land, and it was certainly respectable for a noble to go into
business. Such economic freedom allowed financial and political
support to ventures which in another country might have gone neglected.
The presence of aristocracy in London created a demand for luxury
items and servants, though trades there were already many and numerous.
Ship builders, coopers, brewers, distillers, shoemakers, carpenters,
textilers, brick makers, weavers, potters, and smiths all worked
in London, though, with the passage of time, London lost its industrial
significance in comparison to its mercantile. With England's development
as a naval power, and expansion of colonies, overseas trade predictably
increased, and London became the center of these transactions. In
1694, marking London's transition to a financial center, the Bank
of England opened. London entered the nineteenth century an industrial
city as well as a commercial city, the political and economic capital
of the most powerful stable European nation, one which, as mistress
of the seas, had surpassed Holland in trade, and was now about to
enjoy uncontested global influence.
|