Economic Issues in the Empire

Rarely is the axiom "necessity is the mother of invention"
more true than in economics, and no power in Europe had less economic
necessity at the beginning of the nineteenth century than Austria.
Vienna was a rich city, and somewhat overwhelmingly so; it was a
major trade city, where goods from throughout the Empire were brought
to be bought and sold. (See Industry
in Austria) Unlike England or France, which, due to a lack
of internal resources, were forced to invent brand new economic
systems, based upon mercantilism and industrialization, the Austrians
were content to keep a less industrialized, less modern economy.
While on the surface this approach worked, due to the large variety
of goods produced inside the empire, it also allowed the other European
powers to leapfrog past Austria technologically, as well as economically.
Though by the late nineteenth century Vienna began to be home to
some industry, it tended to be light: there were very few major
factories, and most industry took place in small sweatshops. Because
of the small size of the factories, workers were more isolated,
and therefore less likely to organize a mass revolution. Austrian
workers were remarkably loyal and content, partially because they
had better working conditions than many workers had in other places.
Furthermore, working conditions in Vienna actually weren’t that
bad, at least in contrast to conditions in many other cities. Morton,
in A Nervous Splendor, describes working class Viennese being
too tired for politics after eleven hours at the loom, yet for American
workers an eleven hour day would have been a blessing. He also talks
about how, on the occasion of Franz Joseph’s fifty-eighth birthday,
the school children in the destitute neighborhood of Ottakring had
made posters of the Emperor and glued them all over the city. This
touches on an important issue: that in 1888, even the poorest of
neighborhoods had schoolchildren; in fact, the right to free schooling
was guaranteed under the Basic
Law of 21 December 1867 on the General Rights of Nationals.
Even if the workers themselves were doomed to a life of wage labors,
the government was giving a chance to the children of the working
class.
But the condition of the workers was still inhuman, even if
it was more human than in many other cities. Viennese housing, though
grandiose externally, internally was just as cramped, dirty, and
unlivable as in any other major city. The working classes simply
accepted it more. Like Roman plebeians, accepting the harsh conditions
of their lives in exchange for bread and circuses, the Austrian
lower class seemed hypnotized by the beauty of their city. Even
the most crowded, dirty tenements were beautifully designed on the
outside. Vienna itself "narcotized the poor past their troubles…Here
was poverty spiced with panache, with the capital’s royal flavor."
If anything, the comparatively good conditions only helped to prevent
the already revolution wary Austrians from even considering more
major social change. Furthermore, the disunity of the empire made
it unlikely that all Austrians would ever unite around a common
goal, forcing moderation in government.
|