Gustav Klimt: Synthesis of Traditional and Modern
During Klimt's early years as a painter, 1880 to
1890, for the most part he adapted the style of Hans
Makart, and was not particularly individual in his style.
First signs of a more personal style became evident in his painting
of the ceiling of the Burgtheatre. The painting was flat, very
ornate and decorated, and made us of thick, dominant lines. This
new style began as a mixture of several European styles of the
time, with its roots in the Viennese tradition that Klimt had
become an expert. At this point Klimt was by no means near the
synthesis of modern and traditional, but the initial signs were
there. More signs of change are evident in his decoration of the
Great Staircase of the Art History Museum of Vienna. Even though
this was a public commission, Klimt and his partners avoided the
traditional didactic style of ceiling paintings.

Love
1892 marked a large change in Klimt's style. It
was the year both his father and brother, Ernst, died. He was
eager to be influence. He wanted to do what his Secession would
do five years later- become familiar with foreign art. During
this period before the founding of the Secession, Klimt for the
first time began to mix the old with the new. In a few small paintings,
Joseph Lewinsky in Carlos and
Love, he blended stylization, the
use of unfamiliar elements in realistic paintings, with naturalism.
While the focus of the painting is two people kissing- a natural
thing- looming over them are very unnatural ghouls. The border
of the painting also blends stylism and naturalism, by having
thick gold plates surrounding the painting, an unnatural element,
but along the plates are flowers, obviously natural. By 1898,
the didactic and narrative elements of Klimt's paintings were
almost entirely absent. Klimt also continued to take elements
from several different styles of painting. An example of this
is his 1898 painting, Schubert at the
Piano, which had impressionistic elements. During this
time Klimt was also being influenced by the German Secession painter
Franz
von Stuck (1863-1928), who often mixed the erotic with the
demonic, something Klimt would begin to do.

Judith 1
In 1901, Klimt created his first successful portrait
of a woman; Judith I. This rather
sexual painting helps one understand Klimt's view towards women.
As he would with several later female portraits, Klimt surrounds
Judith with gold- a possible tribute to women. It captures both
the regality and pristine qualities of women through her posture
and surroundings, but at the same time Klimt demonstrates woman's
nearing emancipation and freedom through her nakedness and highly
seductive facial expression. Klimt through several other female
portraits would convey his understanding of Viennese life for
women at the time.
At the same time Klimt's style continued to develop.
In 1902, he exhibited the Beethoven Frieze, a thirty-meter
long work, which further displayed his ability to synthesize several
styles together in order to create an original feeling. In this
case, Klimt was heavily influenced by the Dutch artist Jan
Toorop (1858-1928) in that he used definite lines in this
painting more than he had ever before. He also continued to be
influenced by Stuck. In the Beethoven
Frieze, the mixing of the erotic and demonic is very apparent.
In one section, three naked women stand, but behind them ghouls
and skeletal figures loom over them.

Expectation
It was in 1905 that Klimt fully developed the style
of which he is famous for. Although decoration had always been
present in his work, it now dominated his style. Beyond this the
ornamentation was no easily recognizable, in fact it was often
very abstract. It began with a private commission Klimt did for
the Belgian industrialist Adolphe Stoclet. It consisted of nine
panels, several of which were purely ornamental- no humans, just
designs consisting of squares, spiraling twirls, and upside down
triangles. The untitled panel known as Stocletfrieze,
is a perfect example of this. The most famous panel from the Stoclet
Frieze is Expectation. Surrounded
by the Tree of Life- a rather abstract background consisting of
twisting spirals barely recognizable as a tree- is a woman, who
is only identifiable as a human by her face. Her attire, composed
of triangles the same color as the tree, blends in with the background.
Klimt had fully reached his mature stage as an artist. He was
using lines and colors to their fullest and not letting use of
space hold him back by making the background as important as the
subject.
Also in 1905, Klimt displayed his Portrait
of Fritza Riedler. Here, elements of traditional portrait
painting and a modern style that Klimt created himself are more
apparent than ever. The face of Riedler is realistic and natural,
but realism in the painting ends there. Her garb, a white dress,
flows and extends all the way to the bottom of the painting, continuing
after that; clearly longer and fluffier than a real dress would
be. The use of abstract decoration is evident in the sofa that
Riedler sits on. Barely recognizable as a piece of furniture,
this white sofa is covered in eye shaped ovals. Had Riedler been
removed from the painting, the painting of just the couch could
clearly be considered a piece of abstract art.

Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer
In the Portrait of Fritza Riedler Klimt successfully
blends traditional portrait painting with modern art, but succeeds
even more in the 1907 Portrait of Adele
Bloch-Bauer. Once again, other than the face and arms,
the painting is purely abstract. The painting seems to be a tribute
to the color of gold. Edward Pötzl, an art critic and one of Klimt's
principle enemies, actually describes the painting quite well
in his criticism of it. He explains how Klimt is "the master of
an extraordinary developed technique. And what does he use it
for? In order to paint a mixture of peacocks' tails, mother of
pearls, silverscabs, tinsel and snails' pathsŠ sometimes there
is a bit of human face or body thrown in, sometimes not." (7)
The background of this painting, a splotching of gold paint, contrasts
interestingly with the gold designs of the subject's dress, almost
overwhelms the eye. Also in 1907, Klimt exhibited his most famous
work, The Kiss. The painting depicts
a couple kissing, kneeling on a bed of very colorful flowers,
just at the edge of a cliff. The style of this piece is similar
to that of the portraits- a rather abstract background of not
very easily identifiable elements. The couple represented Klimt
himself with his lover, whom he never married, Emilie Flöge.

Death and Life
With his style now fully defined, Klimt began to
expand even further, emphasizing color more and more. A prime
example of this is the 1908 painting, Death
and Life. The painting depicts two entities. On the right
is a conglomeration of humans, babies, adults, and elders, mixed
together embracing each other. Waiting for them on the left is
death, who has a skull for a head, and is wearing a long blue
cloak primarily composed of crosses. This painting is not particularly
abstract, but is very powerful. Its power is caused by the contrasting
colors of opposing sides. Death is a deep mix of blue and black,
while life is primarily light flesh tones and bright red and orange
garments. It should also be mentioned that originally the background
was gold, but was changed to a dark blue in 1916.
Portrait of Friedericke Maria
Beer
Two other works that display Klimt's use of color
are the Portrait of Friedericke
Maria Beer and The Virgin.
The latter, produced in 1912, was a huge mesh of color, similar
to the mass of humans in Death and Life. The Portrait
of Maria Beer, exhibited in 1916, similarly is a giant mess
of colors. Although it is a portrait, Beer is surrounded by colorful
little oriental men, once again showing Klimt's desire to be influenced.
The figures were adapted from a Korean vase Klimt owned. These
two paintings unite traditional and modern in a different way
than Klimt's earlier works. While the face still remains the only
realistic portion of the painting, the surroundings are now identifiable,
but the mixture of color and crowdedness of the background creates
an abstract effect by making everything difficult to identify.
By this point in Klimt's career, near the very end
of his life, he was as complete an artist that he could ever hope
to be. Not only had he established himself as Austria's premiere
artist, but he was conscious of protecting artistic freedom, founded
the Secession, and promoted young artists. But most importantly
Klimt helped build the bridge from the old to new, merging the
traditional with the modern.
Click here to go back to
the main page.