Gustav Klimt: The University Paintings
These three ceiling paintings, created between 1894
and 1907, are the most important of the first half of Klimt's
career. These paintings were not so important in relation to the
evolution of Klimt's style, although they did play a part in that
as well, but rather they are more important because they demonstrated
Klimt's undying belief in artistic freedom, something which he
brought with him to the Secession and carried with him fought
for until his death in 1918.
Although the first of these paintings wasn't displayed
until the year 1900, the affair began in 1894, when the Ministry
of Education commission Klimt and Franz Matsch to decorate the
Great Hall of the University of Vienna with allegorical paintings.
The theme was to be the Triumph of Light Over Dark. Matsch
created the centerpiece, entitled Theology, and Klimt created
the three secular works, Philosophy, Medicine, and Jurisprudence.
The plans for the project were submitted to the Ministry of Education
in May 1898, and once approved, Klimt declared that they were
"ready to introduce modifications subject to preservation of artistic
freedom" (1) The first of the
three paintings, Philosophy,
was displayed at the Secession's seventh exhibit, from
March to May of 1900. Originally, professors of the University
complained that the painting was not in harmony with the style
of the building it was to be placed in. One professor claimed
he was not opposed to nudity or freedom of the arts but to ugliness.
Despite this criticism the painting won a prize at the Exposition
Universelle in Paris.

Philosophy
The Viennese art critic, Richard Muther, after seeing
the painting in 1900, wrote, "Out of his own, independent pondering
he has created a work in which the whole weight of thought, the
whole colouristic nervosity of our times are embodied. The Heavens
open. Golden and silver stars twinkle. Points of light shimmer.
Naked forms waft hither. The green mist gathers itself into tangible
forms. A fiery head, wreathed in laurels, regards us with large,
earnest eyes. Science struggles to attain the source of Truth,
which remains none the less imponderable Sphinx. We aspire to
lift the veil, dare to take flight amidst the clouds. But the
feeling of ignorance drags us back to earth." (2)
This description serves to show just how large an impact Klimt's
artwork was having on Vienna at the time. The last sentence of
this quote explains the mood of the painting- that society is
afraid to unveil itself, to move on. Klimt's critics believed
this pessimistic view had no place in allegorical painting. They
also believed the allegory itself was too far off and not related
to Philosophy. The painting also holds its place in Klimt's progression
stylistically. Klimt leaves the entire right side of the canvas
rather empty and mildly abstract, showing signs of the style to
come.

Medicine
The second painting, Medicine,
was displayed at the Secession's tenth exhibit, from March to
May of 1901. This painting was greeted with criticism as well.
Again, the unfamiliar form of allegory, and the lack of obvious
symbolism frightened the critics. The painting was very similar
to Philosophy, only everything seemed to be reversed. In
Medicine, the mass of people is on the right instead of
the left, and the female figure, which in Philosophy was
at the very bottom of the painting, is now at the top, and is
unveiled and naked, floating through the sky. Medicine
received further criticism that Philosophy did not; it
was considered pornographic. The naked form in the upper left
corner was asked to either be clothed or turned into a man, as
the University or many of the critics did not support Klimt's
interest in female sexuality. The overall impression of this painting
is very similar to that of Klimt's 1908 work, Death and Life.
One side is bleak, with only one figure, while the other side
is full of intertwining people, young, old, and even dead.

Jurisprudence
Klimt had originally intended the third painting,
Jurisprudence, exhibited
in 1903, to represent Justice, a symbol of the liberal Austria
of the time. But after the criticism of his last two pieces, he
changed the painting to depict in the upper section "Truth, Justice,
and Law," looking down on a condemned man, surrounded by three
naked women. Here, Klimt perhaps purposefully makes his painting
a controversial one. After receiving criticism for this painting,
Klimt finally took action against those who were not supportive
of his artistic freedom. He asked the Ministry if he could keep
his paintings if he returned his payment for the commission. They
initially refused, and urged him to finish the paintings, even
though both parties knew that they would not be used. In a rare
interview, Klimt said on the matter, "I am not very vulnerable
to criticism in general, but I become more vulnerable when I feel
that those who have given me a commission are not satisfied with
my work." (3) Klimt then demanded
that art and the artist in the future should remain free of all
state interference. He ended the interview with the statement.
"I shall not hand over my pictures unless driven to it by force."
Two weeks later the Ministry agreed to let Klimt keep the paintings
in exchange for their payment. In 1945, all three paintings, which
were being stored in southern Austria because of the war, were
destroyed in a fire.
Click here to go back to
the main page.